The Pongo Blog
Overqualified? Turn it into an Advantage
April 15, 2010 (2:01PM) by Rick Saia, CPRW
It's an oft-read or oft-heard story over the past two years: A very experienced, highly skilled person—probably over 50 years old—has worked their way up to a mid- or high-level job, then loses it because of the recession. The person struggles for months, maybe more than a year, to find another suitable job while trying to stay positive about career and life.
Frustrated—and maybe financially desperate—the person aims for lower-level jobs, with lower salaries, just to earn a paycheck and a confidence boost. But sometimes, the rejection message is loud and clear: YOU'RE OVERQUALIFIED!
The stories are depressing. If you've lived through something like it or are living through it now, your stomach might be doing somersaults as you read this. (Sorry!)
If the "overqualified" tag applies to you, here are three "selling statements" you should consider using in a cover letter or interview to emphasize the potential advantages an employer might gain from an overqualified candidate like you:
"I don't need a lot of time to get up to speed on work procedures and policies."
This speaks right to employers' concerns about ramping up new employees, since a long learning curve can be a drag on productivity. But if they hire someone who has done the same or similar work before, they can expect greater results in less time.
"I can share my expertise with colleagues who don't have as much experience."
A company or division with a relatively younger staff can benefit from the older person's experience and wisdom. This is especially true at young startup firms that are aiming to grow within a few years. Someone who has "been there, done that" can be a mentor to those who haven't, and help them grow with the company.
"I know how to work efficiently and get things done."
That's the kind of stuff that can come with experience and a strong work ethic. Older workers probably began their careers in traditional businesses with more hierarchy and structure, which often demanded stronger organizational skills. Seeing an older colleague get things done quickly might inspire younger team members to find ways to work more efficiently.
Some employers fear that an older, more experienced worker would expect the lofty salary they once had, rather than the lower salary range budgeted for the position. That may be true. But as we emerge from a crippling recession, that may become less of an obstacle. Long-term unemployment, if nothing else, forces us to get by on much less income than we'd previously enjoyed. If being overqualified is something that could limit your chances of getting hired, I strongly suggest you consider how much of a pay cut you're willing to accept, and balance that with your expenses. You may be willing to accept a smaller paycheck if you can hook on with a company that can offer you the security of keeping you employed for a long while.
Are your job opportunities limited because you may be "overqualified?" Tell us about your experiences.
RELATED LINKS
What Employers Really Mean by 'You're Overqualified'
Has the Recession Shattered Your Sense of Job Security?
Should You 'Dumb Down' Your Resume to Get a New Job?
Great way to turn a potential employer concern into an advantage. As neurotic as hiring managers are these days there will always be elements in our employment background which some will see as advantages and others will see as concerns.
Thanks for reminding us to come up with good answers for each of the area's of our resume that could be interpreted either way!
Posted by: DC Jobs | April 16, 2010 at 7:54 AM | Quote This Comment
Yes indeed, I belong to one of those 'overqualified' persons. My previous boss jokes about it by telling me I should apply as CEO, because at least then I won't be overqualified. I believe the company's main concern is not that you that you'll get up to speed rapidly (nowadays they assume that you will), or that you may share your knowledge. Their concern is, that by being overqualified you won't stay in the company for a long time and that you'll get bored quickly. And even if you try to convince them of the opposite, if they believe that, there's no way you'll get that job.
Posted by: anne | April 17, 2010 at 3:36 AM | Quote This Comment
@ DC -- Thanks! The key is to find an employer who's receptive to hiring someone whose experience would benefit the company. If they're focused on how much they would have to pay the person they hire, they've got it bass ackwards.
@ Anne -- Yes, I agree that companies are concerned with how long you *might* stay. But to get around that, emphasize the things that would keep you around awhile, such as fulfilling work, a positive company culture, or a better work-life balance.
Posted by: Rick Saia, CPRW | April 20, 2010 at 2:53 PM | Quote This Comment
I love this post Rick! So important to go into an interview with some solid answers that show why you have a lot to add to the mix. Really helps set the right tone when you prepare your resume and cover letter too!
Too many older "overqualified" job seekers start to buy into the idea that older is a handicap. Sure, for some employers it can be - but it doesn't have to be in most cases. Remember when "downsizing" became "rightsizing"? Maybe it would help if we start to think of older, more experienced folks as "right qualified". ;-)
Great read as always.
~ Ronnie Ann
Posted by: Ronnie Ann | April 27, 2010 at 5:18 PM | Quote This Comment
Great advice! It's all in how you spin it. I would suggest that if job seekers are having trouble with that, they should contact a career coach for help. Getting some objective, experienced input to spin a difficult job hunting situation might be just the thing to turn it around! Best of luck, Peggy McKee www.career-confidential.com
Posted by: 30/60/90-Day Plan | May 28, 2010 at 8:24 AM | Quote This Comment
loved the way you explained things. Much better many here
Posted by: mba india | July 09, 2010 at 5:14 AM | Quote This Comment